Post 2: 02/20/2019
Moving Forward: As I move forward with my course project next week, I will await the response from Michael Papadopoulos. Depending on what he says I will either have to go out in the field and map the locations of the cameras or in the case that he does have a map of the existing cameras I map be able to manually put locations into ArcGIS. Also, I will continue to determine which map will provide a better final product.
Data Sources:
“Access and Security.” Siena College, www.siena.edu/offices/public-safety/access-and-security/.
Geographic Information Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Information Science Reference, 2013.
GIS Integration with Public Safety Applications - Esri. www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/gis-integration-public-safety.pdf.
Geographic Information Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Information Science Reference, 2013.
GIS Integration with Public Safety Applications - Esri. www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/gis-integration-public-safety.pdf.
“Surveillance Camera Clip Art.” CLKER FREE Clipart, www.clker.com/clipart-surveillance-camera-.html.
"Siena College" 42°43'07" N 73°43'05" W. Google Earth. 02/20.2019.

I agree with you that both of those maps would be beneficial for your project. Looking at the satellite one, it may just get cluttered and look really busy with all the added things to look at. Maybe you could include both for your project but focus on using the top one to add more layers because that one would probably turn out easier to read? Looking forward to seeing all the mapped camera coverages no campus though!
ReplyDeleteAs with Lauren, I also agree both of the maps are beneficial for this project. The satellite image may be hard to read when plotting out your camera locations, and get over crowded. I would try to stick to the more basic map, as the layout will be a lot easier to read and understand!
ReplyDelete